American Judicial System
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Laws
  • Lawyers
  • Securities
  • Government
  • Employment
  • News
American Judicial System
No Result
View All Result

Can You Go To Jail At A Preliminary Hearing

Janice Ruiz by Janice Ruiz
November 23, 2022
Can You Go To Jail At A Preliminary Hearing
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

If you’ve been arrested for a crime and are facing criminal charges, you will have to go through the legal process. Depending on the severity of your alleged crime and your personal circumstances, your next steps could involve a series of different hearings. A preliminary hearing is one of these stages; it is not an independent proceeding but rather part of the criminal proceedings. A preliminary hearing is also known as an evidentiary hearing or probable cause hearing. It is held before a judge to determine if there is enough evidence to take the case to trial. In this article, we explore whether you can go to jail at a preliminary hearing and what you should know about this stage of the criminal justice process.

Can You Go To Jail At A Preliminary Hearing?

A preliminary hearing is the first court hearing that takes place in criminal cases. It is not a full trial, but it is a more formal hearing that takes place before a case goes to trial. At a preliminary hearing, a judge will determine if there is enough evidence for the case to proceed to trial. If so, the case will then be scheduled for trial. If not, the defendant will be released from custody and the charges may be dropped. A preliminary hearing can lead to either further court proceedings or the end of a criminal case.

Why is there a Preliminary Hearing?

1. To Establish Key Facts

One of the key facts established at a preliminary hearing is the identity of the defendant, as well as the identity of all witnesses. The prosecution will have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is the same person who committed the crime, as well as the witnesses involved, are who they say they are. If the defendant has entered a plea of “not guilty”, then the prosecution will have to present evidence to prove the defendant is, in fact, guilty. Dates, times, and places are essential in proving guilt, as well as establishing a timeline of events to help prove or disprove alibis.

2. To Determine If There Is Sufficient Evidence For Trial

At the preliminary hearing, the prosecution will have to show that there is a reasonable probability that the evidence presented could lead to a conviction. If the evidence is found to be sufficient, then the defendant will have to go to trial, as well as the case will proceed forward. If, however, the judge finds the evidence insufficient, then the case will likely be dismissed.

3. To Decide Whether There Should Be A Jury Or Non-Jury Trial

In some cases, the prosecution and defense may agree to have a jury trial. If the preliminary hearing decides there should be a jury trial, then the judge will set a date for the next proceeding. If, on the other hand, both parties decide there should be a non-jury trial as a result of the preliminary hearing, then there will be a date set for the next proceeding to decide the manner of trial. If the parties cannot reach an agreement on the jury or non-jury trial, the judge will make the decision for them.

4. Because The Defendant Demands One

If the defense thinks the prosecution does not have a strong case against them, then they may choose to have a preliminary hearing. This can happen if the defense believes the prosecution does not have enough evidence or sufficient evidence to prove guilt. If the defense believes they can raise enough doubt about the prosecution’s case, they may want to request a preliminary hearing. If the defense feels that they have a strong enough case and the prosecution’s evidence is lacking, they may request a preliminary hearing to see if the judge agrees with their assessment. The request may be denied, depending on the judge and the strength of the prosecution’s case.

5. Because The Prosecutor Requires One

There are times when the prosecution feels that the evidence against the defendant is so strong that they require a preliminary hearing. This situation can arise if the defense fails to enter a plea, fails to appear in court, or fails to appear for the preliminary hearing. In such cases, the prosecution may want a preliminary hearing so they can move the case forward.

When Can Someone Go to Jail at a Preliminary Hearing?

  • The judge can decide to jail you at a preliminary hearing if any of the following applies:
  • You are charged with a felony.
  • Your bond is set at the highest possible amount
  • A warrant has been issued for your arrest
  • You have failed to appear in court on another case.
  • A bench warrant has been issued for your arrest.
  • You have been convicted of a crime.
  • You are charged with an additional crime.
  • The judge determines that there is enough evidence to take the case to trial.
  • The judge finds that you are a flight risk.
  •  The judge believes that you will not show up for trial.
  • If a judge determines at the preliminary hearing that there is enough evidence to take a case to trial, then the defendant may have to go to jail until the trial is over. 
  • If a judge determines that there is enough evidence to take the case to trial and the defendant is unable to post bail, then the defendant may have to go to jail until the trial is over.

Is Going to Jail at a Preliminary Hearing Rare?

  1. Going to jail at a preliminary hearing is rare, but it does happen. At the preliminary hearing, the judge will review the prosecution’s evidence to determine if it’s strong enough to take the case to trial.
  2.  If the judge finds that the prosecution has met the standard of probable cause, then the judge will order the defendant to go to jail until the trial is over.
  3. A judge might do this if the defendant is considered to be a flight risk. The judge will also order the defendant to go to jail if he or she is considered to be a danger to society. 
  4. This might be the case if the defendant has a history of violence or is accused of a very serious crime.

Should You Hire a Lawyer for a Preliminary Hearing?

  • If you are accused of a crime and facing criminal charges, you may be required to go to a preliminary hearing. It is a good idea to hire a lawyer for the preliminary hearing. At the preliminary hearing, the prosecution will present evidence against you to a judge. 
  • The defense attorney will be able to cross-examine the prosecution’s witnesses and provide evidence in favor of the defense. A good lawyer will be able to challenge the prosecution’s case against you at the preliminary hearing. A good lawyer may be able to challenge the probable cause for taking the case to trial.
  • If you are accused of a crime, it is a good idea to hire an attorney to represent you at the preliminary hearing. At the preliminary hearing, the prosecutor will likely try to convince the judge that there is enough evidence for the case to move forward. If you have a lawyer who knows how to defend your case in court, then your chances of getting a fair trial will be better.
  • If you are charged with a crime and the judge finds that there is enough evidence to move forward with the case, then your trial will probably be scheduled within a few weeks. Even if you are able to post bail, you’ll have to wait until your trial date arrives before you can get out of jail. For a criminal case, this may take several months at the very least. It depends on the speed of the court system in your county. In some counties, it can take years for cases to get through their courts.

Summing Up

It is possible to go to jail at a preliminary hearing, but this is rare. At the preliminary hearing, the judge will review the prosecution’s evidence to determine if it’s strong enough to take the case to trial. If the judge finds that the prosecution has met the standard of probable cause, then the judge will order the defendant to go to jail until the trial is over. A good lawyer may be able to challenge the prosecution’s case against you at the preliminary hearing, which can help to prevent the judge from ordering you to go to jail before the trial is over. 

Previous Post

Can Charges Be Dropped At A Preliminary Hearing

Next Post

Can Police Take Your Phone Without Your Permission

Janice Ruiz

Janice Ruiz

Janice Ruiz is a paralegal who comes from a long line of legal professionals in her family. When not working or writing, she enjoys watching documentaries about true crime events.

Related Posts

Why Joel E. Brown Is the Name Peoria Locals Trust for Personal Injury Cases
Laws

Why Joel E. Brown Is the Name Peoria Locals Trust for Personal Injury Cases

Intent vs. Outcome
Laws

Intent vs. Outcome: How to Prove You’re Not a White Collar Criminal

The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident
Laws

The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident

How a Car Accident Lawyer in St. Petersburg Handles Cases Involving Uninsured Drivers
Laws

How a Car Accident Lawyer in St. Petersburg Handles Cases Involving Uninsured Drivers

Why Arizona’s Safe Passing Law Matters After a Bike Accident Cyclists in Arizona share the road with fast-moving vehicles daily, often placing their safety in the hands of motorists. While the open roads may offer freedom, they also come with serious risks when drivers fail to respect cyclists' space. Arizona's Safe Passing Law plays a vital role in determining fault and guiding compensation after a bicycle-related crash. Understanding this law becomes essential for anyone seeking the guidance of a bicycle accident lawyer in Phoenix. Safe passing regulations influence liability assessments, affect settlement negotiations, and impact how claims are litigated. Recognizing the law's practical implications allows injured cyclists to assert their rights more effectively. Overview of Arizona’s Safe Passing Requirements Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) §28-735 outlines the Safe Passing Law, requiring motorists to allow a minimum of three feet of clearance when overtaking a bicycle. This rule applies whether the cyclist is in a designated bike lane or sharing the main roadway with other vehicles. The intent is clear: create a buffer that protects cyclists from sudden swerves, side mirrors, or unexpected road debris. The three-foot rule isn’t merely a guideline—it carries legal weight. Violating it constitutes a traffic offense and often signals negligence in the context of personal injury claims. The Law’s Role in Determining Driver Negligence When a collision involves a motorist and a cyclist, one of the first legal questions is whether the driver upheld their duty of care. Failure to provide the mandated clearance supports a finding of negligence, which becomes foundational to any injury claim. A bicycle accident lawyer in Phoenix will closely examine crash scene evidence—such as tire marks, vehicle position, and witness statements—to assess compliance with the Safe Passing Law. Proving that a driver violated this statute strengthens the injured cyclist’s argument and often influences how insurance adjusters value the claim. How Violations Influence Compensation Calculations Arizona follows a pure comparative negligence model, allowing injured parties to recover damages even if partially at fault. However, the percentage of fault assigned to each party directly impacts the financial recovery. When a motorist breaches the Safe Passing Law, that violation typically increases their share of responsibility. Demonstrating such misconduct may significantly shift the fault allocation, potentially increasing the injured cyclist’s compensation. Photographs, dash cam footage, and official citations all serve as evidence to show a breach of this duty. Importance of Scene Documentation and Witness Accounts After any bike accident, immediate documentation proves essential. Arizona’s Safe Passing Law is often interpreted based on distance, which can be challenging to measure accurately without proper evidence. Cyclists should attempt to gather details from witnesses, obtain police reports, and photograph road conditions if physically able. Legal teams use this information to create collision reconstructions and demonstrate how the driver encroached on the cyclist’s space. Because the law centers on proximity, even subtle lane deviations can establish liability. Witnesses who observed an unsafe pass become critical to affirming legal violations. Interplay Between Local Ordinances and State Law While ARS §28-735 applies statewide, cities like Phoenix may implement additional traffic rules that reinforce or expand safe passing protocols. In some cases, local regulations include stricter language or define more precise boundaries on shared roadways. Understanding the interaction between municipal codes and state law offers an advantage in personal injury litigation. Attorneys often reference both layers of regulation to present a comprehensive argument for liability. Local traffic citations further support claims of driver misconduct under both legal frameworks. Impact on Motorist Insurance Disputes Insurance carriers assess fault based on police reports, statutes, and the circumstances surrounding the incident. When drivers ignore the Safe Passing Law, they expose themselves to scrutiny not only from law enforcement but also from their insurers. Claims adjusters may attempt to minimize the severity of an infraction or question the cyclist's behavior. However, when clear evidence shows that a motorist failed to allow three feet of space, it becomes harder to dispute liability. Legal representatives utilize this leverage to challenge lowball offers and negotiate for fair settlements. Commercial Vehicles and Elevated Legal Expectations When delivery trucks, service vans, or rideshare vehicles collide with cyclists, the standards become even more stringent. Commercial drivers often receive specialized training and are expected to be thoroughly familiar with traffic laws and regulations. and regulations Violations of the Safe Passing Law involving commercial vehicles may trigger company liability or federal regulatory scrutiny. This elevates the legal stakes and provides injured cyclists with additional avenues for compensation. Corporate policies, driver logs, and internal training materials often become evidence in these cases. Preventable Harm and the Public Safety Argument Violations of the Safe Passing Law go beyond individual negligence; they represent a larger disregard for public safety. Arizona enacted the law to protect cyclists from serious and preventable harm. When motorists fail to follow it, the consequences are often catastrophic. Legal teams may incorporate this public safety aspect into their case strategy, especially when seeking punitive damages. Courts often consider whether a driver’s conduct showed a conscious disregard for others’ well-being. The Safe Passing Law provides a measurable benchmark for such assessments. Strategic Use of Safe Passing Law in Civil Claims For injured cyclists, the Safe Passing Law offers more than a safety guideline—it serves as a legal tool. Demonstrating that a motorist violated this statute provides substantial grounds for establishing fault, increasing claim value, and countering comparative negligence arguments. Thorough documentation, knowledgeable legal representation, and a clear understanding of the law's implications all contribute to stronger and more effective injury claims. After a bike crash, the path to recovery often depends on proving that the driver's actions failed to meet the standard set by Arizona's Safe Passing Law.
Laws

Why Arizona’s Safe Passing Law Matters After a Bike Accident

Navigating GPS Tracking Laws by State
Laws

Navigating GPS Tracking Laws by State: Legal and Social Implications

Next Post
Can Police Take Your Phone Without Your Permission

Can Police Take Your Phone Without Your Permission

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Why Joel E. Brown Is the Name Peoria Locals Trust for Personal Injury Cases
  • Intent vs. Outcome: How to Prove You’re Not a White Collar Criminal
  • The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident
  • How a Car Accident Lawyer in St. Petersburg Handles Cases Involving Uninsured Drivers
  • Top Reasons to Choose a Personal Injury Lawyer

Categories

  • Business (6)
  • Digital Marketing (2)
  • Employment (38)
  • Financial (2)
  • Government (22)
  • Laws (1,252)
  • Lawyers (557)
  • News (305)
  • Securities (44)
  • Social Media (1)
AJS logo

We are a blog that talks about different law-related topics. We focus primarily on the business side of law, including technology and innovation in the legal industry. We’ve been around since 2015 so we have an extensive archive of articles to choose from. Learn more at AJS Blog!

editor@ajs.org

Categories

  • Business
  • Digital Marketing
  • Employment
  • Financial
  • Government
  • Laws
  • Lawyers
  • News
  • Securities
  • Social Media

Follow Us

 

Recent News

  • Why Joel E. Brown Is the Name Peoria Locals Trust for Personal Injury Cases
  • Intent vs. Outcome: How to Prove You’re Not a White Collar Criminal
  • The Role of Butler Injury Law in Austin in Ensuring Fair Compensation After an Accident
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

© 2025 American Judicial System- All Rights Reserved By AJS

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Laws
  • Lawyers
  • Securities
  • Government
  • Employment
  • News

© 2025 American Judicial System- All Rights Reserved By AJS