In San Diego, car collisions are not new. When you get involved in such a mishap, evidence is crucial to get justice. In many such incidents, people rely on digital evidence such as Dashcams, CCTV footage, etc. However, in San Diego, there are places where surveillance coverage is inadequate. Sometimes, the digital surveillance may be affected by weather or other issues, too.
What do you do when you get involved in a car crash and there is no adequate CCTV footage? Do not lose hope, as there are other ways to prove the liability of the other party. You must hire a capable and experienced car accident attorney. Such skilled lawyers use circumstantial evidence and other means to strengthen these cases. Their legal strategy and investigation skills bring out the truth in the open!
Why digital evidence may not be available in some car crash cases?
While San Diego roads are under digital surveillance coverage, there can be some spots where the coverage is not uniform. In some suburban neighborhoods and coastal areas, security cameras are rare. Sometimes, the recorded footage may get corrupted or overwritten. In some other cases, the camera may also malfunction.
When these issues make digital evidence scarce, a skilled lawyer focuses on other types of evidence. From interviewing witnesses to using accident reconstruction experts, they try everything in their power.
Using circumstantial evidence in car accident cases
In many car crash cases, lawyers have to rely on circumstantial evidence to improve case prospects. Here are a few examples:
- The best car accident lawyers San Diego may use vehicle damage patterns and skid mark measurements to infer if a driver was overspeeding.
- Witness accounts and mobile GPS data can be used to prove a driver’s fault as well.
- They can use vehicle log data to probe bases involving rideshare vehicles.
- Such layers can use weather data to prove the role of a storm or excessive rain leading to a car crash.
The legal stance on using circumstantial evidence
In San Diego, courts accept circumstantial evidence when the lawyer can back it with examples and supporting evidence. Skilled lawyers know how to use various types of supporting evidence to build a case even when the direct evidence is scarce.
Tackling the insurer’s tactics
In many instances, insurance firms may not offer fair compensation, citing the lack of direct or digital evidence. They may try to use the comparative negligence clause and argue about the viability of witnesses, etc. A capable attorney tackles such tactics by using multiple measures. They use expert testimony, case examples, and police reports to fetch the proper compensation.
What to do when there is not much digital evidence
If you get injured in a car collision and realize there’s no dashcam or CCTV, don’t panic. Call the cops and document everything if you can. This will help your lawyer develop the case later.
Conclusion
The lack of a dashcam or CCTV footage will not necessarily sink your case! A skilled car accident lawyer will overcome this hurdle. Of course, you will have to hire an attorney with a track record of winning such cases. A proper consultation session will help you with the assessment.
