Judicial
Ethics
Judicial
Independence
Judicial
Selection
Forensic
Science
Pro Se
Forum
Jury
Center
High School
Curriculum
AJS
Store
Search 
Site Map    Shopping Cart
Customer Service | Contact Us | Join/Give to AJS
About AJS
AJS Leadership
Awards
Contact AJS
Judicature
Membership/Give
News Releases
Publications and Resources
Upcoming Meetings and Events
Drake University




  Your location: AJS Main Site :: Judicature :: Recent Issue

Judicature, the Journal of AJS
March-April 2008, Volume 91, Number 5

Summary

This is a summary of the most recent issue of Judicature. To view our March/April 2006 issue on the death penalty, click here

Contents:

Articles
The verdict on juries  
by Valerie P. Hans, Professor of Law at Cornell Law School (Valerie.hans@cornell.edu) and Neil Vidmar, Russell M. Robinson II Professor of Law at Duke Law School (vidmar@law.duke.edu).

The American jury remains basically sound, the verdict is clearly in its favor.

226  JUDICATURE 91 (March/April 2008)

Judicial campaign oversight committees' complaint handling in the 2006 elections: Survey and recommendations 
by William Fortune, a law professor at the University of Kentucky College of Law (fortunew@uky.edu) and Penny J. White, an associate professor of law and director of the Center for Advocacy and Dispute Resolution at the University of Tennessee College of Law (pwhite4@utk.edu)

Other than candidates' self-restraint, judicial campaign oversight committees serve as the only barrier against the "Barbarians at the Gate."

232  JUDICATURE 91 (March/April 2008)

The attorney gender gap in U.S. Supreme Court litigation 
by Tammy A. Sarver, an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at Benedictine University (tsarver@ben.edu); Erin B. Kaheny, an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee (ekaheny@uwm.edu); and John J. Szmer, an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (jjszmer@uncc.edu).

Women lawyers still face serious barriers to advancement and access to power, as illustrated by the dearth of women lawyers participating in Supreme Court litigation.

238  JUDICATURE 91 (March/April 2008)

Viewpoint

Ducks redux  
by Steven Lubet, Williams Memorial Professor of Law at Northwestern University (slubet@law.northwestern.edu).

In refusing to recuse following his duck-hunting trip with Vice President Cheney, Justice Scalia articulated a new bright-line rule, stating that the ordinary disqualification standards do not apply in "official capacity" cases. But is it actually the law?

223  JUDICATURE 91 (March/April 2008)

Books

Is there a better way?  
The Next Justice: Repairing the Supreme Court Appointments Process, by Christopher L. Eisgruber, reviewed by Albert P. Melone, Professor Emeritus, Department of Political Science, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale (melone@siu.edu or almelone@mchsi.com)

252  JUDICATURE 91 (March/April 2008)

Briefs

AJS revises its Model Judicial Selection Provisions  

251  JUDICATURE 91 (March/April 2008)

Editorial

A closer look at mandatory arbitration for consumers  

Lack of real agreement, the unfairness of the repeat player effect, and the harm secret decisions are doing to our public justice system in mandatory arbitration for consumers have given traditional (i.e., business-to-business) ADR a bad name..

220  JUDICATURE 91 (March/April 2008)

President's Report

A lesson in judicial selection from Kosovo  

222  JUDICATURE 91 (March/April 2008)

 
AJS Video
This five-minute video conveys the history and essence of the mission & work of AJS.
View video.
21st National College on Judicial Conduct and Ethics
October 29-31, 2008 Chicago, Illinois
Click here for details.
Join AJS today
Membership has its benefits.
Join today.



© Copyright American Judicature Society, 2008.
Questions? Call us weekdays 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. CST. 800.626.4089.