Judicial
Ethics
Judicial
Independence
Judicial
Selection
Public
Education
Jury
Center
Forensic
Science
Pro Se
Forum
AJS
Store
Search 
Site Map    Shopping Cart
Customer Service | Contact Us | Join/Give to AJS
About AJS
AJS Leadership
Awards
Contact AJS
Donors / Sponsorships / Benefactors
Judicature
Members
News Releases
Publications and Resources
State Chapters
Upcoming Meetings and Events
Drake University




  Your location: AJS Main Site :: Judicature :: Recent Issue

Judicature, the Journal of AJS
May-June 2009, Volume 92, Number 6

Summary

This is a summary of the most recent issue of Judicature.

To order a copy of this issue, click here. To subscribe to Judicature, click here. Note that subscriptions are limited to institutions only. Individual subscriptions are included with a membership to AJS. To become a member, click here.

Contents:

Articles

W. Bush's judicial legacy: Mission accomplished
by Sheldon Goldman, a professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts - Amherst (Sheldon.goldman@polsci.umass.edu), Sara Schiavoni, an instructor in political science at John Carroll University (sschiavoni@jcu.edu), and Elliot Slotnick, a professor of political science at The Ohio State University and associate dean of the Graduate School (slotnick.1@gradsch.ohio-state.edu).

George W. Bush's legacy includes the appointment of like-minded Supreme Court justices and lower court judges selected by a process structured to achieve that result.

92  JUDICATURE 258 (May-June 2009)

George W. Bush's legacy on the federal bench: Policy in the face of diversity
by Jennifer Segal Diascro, an assistant professor in the Department of Government at American University (diascro@american.edu) and Rorie Spill Solberg, an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at Oregon State University (rorie.spillsolberg@oregonstate.edu).

While he valued diversity and considered it when making judicial appointments, Bush's legacy is more accurately described as one that emphasized ideological and policy considerations..

92  JUDICATURE 289 (May-June 2009)

The "Bush Twins"? Roberts, Alito, and the conservative agenda
by Barbara A. Perry, Carter Glass Professor in the Department of Government at Sweet Briar College (perry@sbc.edu).

In cases involving abortion, campaign finance reform, voting rights, Fourth Amendment protections, church-state issues, and public school integration, Roberts and Alito have pushed the high court to the more conservative position.

92  JUDICATURE 302 (May-June 2009)

Right on: The decision-making behavior of George W. Bush's judicial appointees
by Robert Carp, a professor of political science at the University of Houston (racarp@uh.edu), Kenneth L. Manning, an associate professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth (kmanning@umassd.edu), and Ronald Stidham, a professor emeritus in the Department of Government and Justice Studies at Appalachian State University (ronstidham@charter.net).

In terms of overall voting patterns, President Bush's judges are clearly the most conservative on record for all modern administrations.

92  JUDICATURE 312 (May-June 2009)

Advice and consent during the Bush years: The politics of confirming federal judges
by Sarah Binder, a senior fellow at The Brookings Institution and a professor of political science at George Washington University (sbinder@brookings.edu) and Forrest Maltzman, a professor of politcal science at George Washington University (forrest@gwu.edu)..

Polarization of advice and consent worsened over the Bush years, but was broadly consistent with the deterioration of judicial selection over the past several decades.

92  JUDICATURE 320 (May-June 2009)

Focus

The National Conference of State Trial Judges: Celebrating 50 Golden Years, planning for the next 50
by Stephanie Domitrovich, a judge on the Erie County Court of Common Pleas, Pennsylvania (sdomitrovich@eriecountygov.org) and Michael J. Saks, Regents' Professor at the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University.

92  JUDICATURE 331 (May-June 2009)

Editorial

Return to the first principles of juvenile justice

The reduced decision-making capacity of juveniles, and the evidence that unregulated and far-reaching waiver policies do more harm than good, provide a rational basis for returning to the first principles of the juvenile court--intervention and avoiding harm--to restore the traditional borders of the juvenile justice system..

92  JUDICATURE 256 (May-June 2009)

President's Report

Recent events highlight AJS priorities  

92  JUDICATURE 257 (May-June 2009)

 
Law Firm Benefactors
View the current Benefactor Firms
click here
Join AJS today
Membership has its benefits.
Join today.



© Copyright American Judicature Society, 2009.
Questions? Call us weekdays 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. CST. 800.626.4089.