Judicial
Ethics
Judicial
Independence
Judicial
Selection
Public
Education
Jury
Center
Forensic
Science
Pro Se
Forum
AJS
Store
Search 
Site Map    Shopping Cart
Customer Service | Contact Us | Join/Give to AJS
About AJS
AJS Leadership
Awards
Contact AJS
Donors / Sponsorships / Benefactors
Judicature
Members
News Releases
Publications and Resources
State Chapters
Upcoming Meetings and Events
Drake University




  AJS / Drake Justice System Series Your location: AJS Main Site :: AJS / Drake Justice System Series

AJS / Drake Law School Justice System Series

Summary

The American Judicature Society, in collaboration with the Drake Law School, presents sessions on the Justice System.  All sessions are Free and Open to the Public.  Often CLE credit, including ethics credit, is available. 

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

       

October 23, 2009

"Learning from Caperton: Ensuring Judicial Impartiality
  The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Caperton v Massey Coal Company, 129 S. Ct. 2252 2009), was a reminder that an impartial judge is a requirement of due process and that even just the appearance of bias can rise to the level of a constitutional violation.  Emphasizing the importance of an objective inquiry, the Court held that, because the campaign efforts of the principal officer of a party "had a significant and disproportionate influence" in placing one of the justices of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals on the case, that justice's failure to disqualify violated the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution.  The reversal of one state court decision on impartiality grounds should act as a wake-up call for all state judiciaries to re-examine their practices and rules regarding disqualification even outside the "extraordinary" facts and election context of Caperton.
       
June 19, 2008 "The Evolving Role of the Trial Judge"
The Changing Face of Judging discussed by panelists Alan L. Pearson, Iowa District Court Judge; Kristin Hibbs; Jaki K. Samuelson, attorney with Whitfield and Eddy; Leon F. Spies, Attorney with Mellon & Spies.  Moderator was Mark J. Wiedenfeld, Attorney with Wiedenfeld & McLaughlin

New Iowa Rules Addressing Electronic Discovery presented by Michael W. Thrall, Attorney with Nyemaster Goode Law Firm.

The Future of Trial Judging discussed by Annette J. Scieszinski, Iowa District Court Judge; Brian P. Galligan, Attorney with Galligan, Galligan, Doyle, Reid & Galligan; and Dwight W. James, Attorney with The James Law Firm.

       
November 28, 2007

"Justice at Home and Abroad: the Importance of the Rule of Law"

           
 

Agenda      

Program Summary Promotional Flyer
       
April 20, 2007

"Maintaining Iowa's Fair and Impartial Judiciary"

  U.S. Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, Celeste F. Bremer, President of the Iowa Family Policy Center, Chuck D. Hurley, Iowa District Court Judge, Jeffrey A. Neary, Past President of the Iowa Bar Association and the Iowa Academy of Trial Lawyers, Nick Critelli. Moderated by American Judicature Society Executive Vice President, Seth S. Andersen
       
March 8, 2007

"Collisions of Conscience and Professional Responsibility: When Judges, Pharmacists, Lawyers, and Doctors Choose Not to Serve"

       
 

Agenda

Program Summary  

Faculty Biographies

Promotional Flyer
       

November 1, 2006

Judging Elections: How Courts Shape the Democratic Process
Presented by Adjunct Professor of Political Science at Drake University, Kieran Williams, Assistant Professor of Politics & International Relations at Drake University, Rachel Paine Caufield and Executive Director and Legal Counsel for the Iowa Ethics and Campaign Disclosure Board, Charlie Smithson.
       
February 28, 2006

How the Media Impacts Judicial Independence and Accountability

  More than 80 attendees were treated to presentations by the Honorable Mark Bennett, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa; Professor Rachel Paine Caufield, Consultant to the AJS Hunter Center for Judicial Selection; and Professor Kathleen Richardson, Drake School of Journalism.

The presentations were followed by a lively panel discussion and Q & A session with the audience. Professor Mark Kende, James Madison Chair and Director of the Constitutional Law Center at Drake Law School moderated the program.

       
February 9, 2006

The Jury and the American Litigation Process

  Professor David McCord reported on how the jury has evolved in American history, with primary focus on the "jury reform" movement that has gathered steam over the past two decades.  He examined the slow transition from juries as passive recipients of information to the emerging model of jurors as active learners.  This movement has been given a significant boost through the new ABA Jury Trial Principles, adopted in February 2005.

Judge Dale E. Ruigh, Iowa District Court, presented on “plain English” jury instructions. The presentation provided a historical overview of the conversion of jury instructions from “legalese” into plain English, both in Iowa and elsewhere; methods for drafting and communicating the instructions to the jury for maximum comprehension; and a discussion of the benefits to the trial bar of plain English instructions.

Attorney Timothy Eckley presented on the phenomenon of the "vanishing jury trial," which has been noted with alarm by many researchers.  Eckley traced the numerical decline in trials over the past forty years, propose causes for the trends, and canvass possible remedial measures.

   
November 15, 2005 Pro Se Litigation in Iowa
  Panelists included: Iowa District Court Judge Patrick Grady, Iowa District Court Judge Robert Blink, Iowa Legal Aid Attorney, Chris Luzzie, Iowa Legal Aid, Eve Ricaurte and Drake Law School Professor, Robert Rigg.  Panel was moderated by Drake Law School Professor, Andrea Charlow.
       
October 3, 2005 Barry Scheck on Wrongful Convictions
  Cofounder and executive director of the Innocence Project at Cardozo School of Law, Scheck is a nationally recognized expert on the use of DNA evidence in the courtroom. 

Scheck’s current focus is the Innocence Project, a labor of love which came into existence in 1992 with colleague Peter Neufeld. The Project is based at Cardozo Law School in New York His work has awakened many Americans to the reality that their criminal justice system is not flawless. His efforts have helped identify and highlight the defects that require attention.

Over 200 people were in attendance.

 
Law Firm Benefactors
View the current Benefactor Firms
click here
AJS Video
This five-minute video conveys the history and essence of the mission & work of AJS.
View video.


ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES
© Copyright American Judicature Society, 2009.
Questions? Call us weekdays 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. CST. 800.626.4089.